michelel72 (michelel72) wrote,

"Castle", first two seasons: Light and fun

So ninjamonkey73 got into Castle … round about season two, I suppose? And she's recently been very into it. I always meant to get into it but never quite got around to it, but in the aftermath of the third season's finale, she tracked down the first two seasons for me and [personal profile] violetcheetah to watch. (We can't see season three yet; the network is only airing isolated episodes, and I hate watching things out of order. More than that, we both vastly prefer to watch with captions/subtitles so that we don't miss dialogue, which means the typical online methods aren't useful. We'll catch up when that season releases in September and just buffer season four for a few weeks.)

I'm actively enjoying it; it's fun. Stana Katic has some serious charisma, and Nathan Fillion is magical. I can't say I ship them, at least yet, but I definitely like each of them and like them as friends.

Some thoughts on the first two seasons, in no particular order:

She's the boss: From the outset, Beckett gives orders to the two junior (male) detectives, and no kind of deal is made of this. Katic does a fantastic job of selling her character as tough and in-control when the situation demands, but she can just as easily be playful (I adore the glee she takes in yanking Castle's chain) or vulnerable.

Cherchez la femme: That said, there doesn't really seem to be much to Beckett as a character. Who is she, really? She has a formative trauma; she apparently helped her father climb back out of alcoholism several years after that trauma; she likes baseball (which mostly seems a cheap tie-in to the Plot of the Week, so she could fangirl over meeting Joe Torre, except that they did have her try to look up the score of "the game" the week before); she … went to Stuy? The character is meant to be closed-off, yes, and the series is actually about Castle rather than her … but I'm not sure I see what it is that Castle is supposed to be falling for. By the end of season two, he seemed more jealous of her attention going to Denning than interested in her for anything to do with her. I'm hoping we get a better idea of who she is in season three.

Make love, not war: Both Castle and his mother are freely, unapologetically sexual. I really appreciate that; US television is usually so puritanically knotted up regarding anything to do with sex. To see both characters happy with short-term affairs, and particularly to see a sexually active senior (though they've settled Martha down in the second season), is a refreshing change. On the downside, Kate seems to be punished for stepping outside the narrative-approved sexual configuration. I mean, what was that with Denning? He was a good guy, she liked being with him … and the thought that Castle thus might stop trailing after her makes her dump him? … And then she's further punished by having to watch Castle walk away to spend the summer with his more recent ex-wife just as she's lost her relationship? On the one hand, the setup plays into her avowedly more classic relationship model ("one and done", I think she put it); on the other hand, it veers uncomfortably close to the tired old trope of endorsing male oats-sowing while demanding fidelity and/or viginity from women. I dunno, it worries me a bit.

Isn't it bromantic?: Meanwhile, Ryan and Esposito. Having watched the series in order (*cough*), I can totally see why this pairing is so very fandom-popular. From the very first episode, just look at how close together the two stand. Americans, particularly American men, typically have a hell of a lot more interpersonal space between them … and that's leaving aside the particularly macho quirks of their profession. The two play off one another constantly, swapping off sentences (and possibly finishing one another's sentences, a trait they cited as evidence that Castle and Beckett were totally into one another in season two). By episode four or five, it's canon that they hang out for gaming enough that Esposito particularly likes one of Ryan's couches. It's not until episode nine (out of ten total in the first season) that Ryan suggests having a girlfriend … in a reference so self-emasculating and ham-handed that it serves as mockery for the next half season. To the point that former colleagues are greeting him as "Honey Milk"; to the point that by 2x16, everyone is effectively accusing Ryan of having invented a beard. That's also the first time that the show actually displays the girlfriend, at the very end. I mean, seriously, in 2x06, Ryan and Esposito go to Castle's Halloween party together, with each other! This stuff writes itself, and I can imagine about six different plotlines explaining Jenny in the context of a Ryan/Esposito ship. (That's leaving out bashing scenarios, by the way.)

By the end of season two, I get more of a partnership vibe than a shippy one from them. That's actually fine with me — I find partnership, friendship, and teaminess far more compelling — even if it's a little disappointing to see the show apparently revert to the dead-red-heteronormative, everybody's-inherently-straight, who's-this-Kinsey-you-speak-of model so beloved of US television. Le sigh. (The sole element I can remember, out of the entire two seasons, in which any other possibility seems to be acknowledged is the pair of guys who found the rug in 1x04. Which is the episode that confirmed Ryan and Esposito spent off time together, by the way. Nudge, wink, and so forth.)

On the partner front, I adore that Esposito is devoted to his former partner and his current partner(s) without any kind of competition or jealousy involved in those connections. And watching Ryan and Esposito take the piss out of Castle will never get old.

O Captain! my captain!: There's another important figure in the department, and that's the boss, Roy Montgomery. Can I just say I love him? He gets the job done. He looks out for his people and knows the right connections to play. He can glance up and know, just by the fact that his detective and her plus-one are walking in front of a person of interest, that they're in trouble. He is good at his job and competence is always my squee.

I am just sufficiently spoiled for season three to be really upset. Dammit.

As you know, Bob …: The police-work in general, in contrast … ugh. "Criminal Minds" occasionally has a tin-eared moment in which the characters explain their jobs to one another or take five full minutes to process an elementary deduction, but those moments are rare. CBS knows its audience has seen a police procedural ever, and they've mostly figured out how to convey developments to the audience without resorting to making the characters intellectually challenged Captain Obvious auditioneers. "Criminal Minds: Suspect Behavior", on the other hand, failed badly on that score … but "Castle" kind of makes CM:SB look brilliantly written in comparison. Every now and then, they lampshade it or make the characters react naturally to "well, duh" moments (such as Esposito using a TLA and then explaining it to Castle in an aside … and Castle responding that yeah, he knows); unfortunately, that just makes the surrounding clunky handling that much more obvious.

One of my greatest complaints about "FlashForward" and "V" was that I, a software programmer with a writing hobby, would (with no further training) make a better FBI agent than their leads. I don't want to say that about this show, but the scripting certainly doesn't make me think any of these people are remotely intelligent or skilled (with specific exceptions). At least I know to cover the back,wtf people, why did it take this NYPD squad until 2x19 to figure out that little trick? (Of course, in a world in which the entire elite FBI team all crowds into one tiny room for more efficient getting-blowed-up, that kind of skill development is pretty exceptional.) As I mentioned before, competence is my squee, and you're killing me here, Smalls!

(I wonder if writers could do a better job of portraying law enforcement by somehow — hear me out — spending some amount of time with actual law enforcement officers somehow … nah, that's crazy talk.)

Old soul: Speaking of only-in-fiction: Alexis. Given her character history, particularly a childlike primary caregiver/parent and an irresponsible-and-absent mother, with a formerly itinerant paternal grandmother and unknown paternal grandfather to boot, hypermaturity makes perfect sense. The way they've written Alexis, though, is something else: namely, the child who is wise beyond her years. US television adores this trope. Alexis has not just the maturity but the apparent experience and wisdom of a fifty-year-old woman, and that's a bit much. All that said, though, I do really like her character, and the actress absolutely sells it. I'd like to know Alexis in real life.

Father of the year: I'm not so sure I'd want to know Castle in real life. He's fun and funny and damned attractive, but his immaturity would be offputting. Every now and then, though, he acts as a real father to Alexis, and I adore those moments. (Which is weird, because that sort of thing usually does very little for me.) He wants to be the cool dad, but he'll still call the other parents when Alexis's friend gets drunk. It's not every episode, but he regularly shows that he can be an adult and do what's right for his daughter. He knows her life and her friends. He regularly plays games with her — whether that's laser tag, movie-style fencing, or poker. The way he consistently does the right thing by Alexis really works for me.

TL;DR: Fun show. Would watch again. Looking forward to seasons three and four.

Originally posted at Dreamwidth | Comment | comment count unavailable comments
Tags: reviews, reviews:tv, squee

  • Insert title here

    Sometimes story titles are just there for me, but when they're not ... ugh. I thought I had worked out a title for my current story, but then I…

  • What have I wrought?! (Fanfic help?)

    So remember that time I was all fangirly about Love Is All You Need to Destroy Your Enemies (WtNV/Dresden)? I sort of accidentally wrote a fic set…

  • Cater to me, world, cater to meeee ...

    I want a structure beta, on-call. Someone willing to just have 27,500 words dumped in their lap (a story in which the climax is an 8,300-word,…

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded